За Витгенщайн
Катедра „Логика, етика и естетика“ има удоволствието да Ви покани на две публични лекции на доц. д-р Алойс Пихлер (Берген).
Алойс Пихлер е доцент в Института по философия на Университета в Берген, Норвегия, както и директор на помещаващите се там Витгенщайнови архиви. Той гостува на специалност Философия в рамките на програма „Еразъм“ и по време на престоя си ще изнесе обявените по-долу лекции. Редом с това той е готов – в случай на интерес – да направи и консултации с наши студенти.
[лекция 1:]
Digital Wittgenstein research: an update
31 окт., четв., 10:15 ч., комп. зала „Яйцито“, 4 блок, партера
The Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen (WAB): History and mission
-
1990-: A ”machine-readable version” of the Wittgenstein Nachlass
-
Wittgenstein’s Nachlass: The Bergen Electronic Edition (OUP 2000)
Open Access primary sources
-
5000 pages Wittgenstein Nachlass: http://wittgensteinsource.org and http://wab.uib.no/wab_hw.page/
Open Access secondary sources
-
Ca. 500 papers from the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society International Wittgenstein symposia: http://wab.uib.no/agora-alws/
-
Ca. 150 articles, monographs and lectures (audio and video) from the WAB archives: http://wab.uib.no/agora-wab/
-
Ca. 300 articles and monographs from the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society series at Ontos Verlag
-
New international online Wittgenstein journal: http://nordicwittgensteinreview.com/
Reading, searching, navigating and annotation tools
-
IDP – Interactive dynamic presentation: http://wab.uib.no/transform/wab.php?modus=opsjoner
-
WiTTFind – Advanced text search: http://wittfind.cis.uni-muenchen.de/
-
SwickyNotes and Pundit – Semantic Web navigating and annotation: http://dbin.org/swickynotes/, http://thepund.it
[лекция 2:]
Wittgenstein: no cultural relativist
31 окт., четв., 13:15 ч., аудитория 532, 1 блок
My paper has two parts. In the first part I will start with a close reading of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations (PI) §206 and related passages. In relating my reading to issues of Cultural Relativism, I will then try to show that the PI both questions and opposes Cultural Relativism. In the second part of the paper I use Wittgenstein’s Nachlass to further deepen my discussion. In short, the argument against Cultural Relativism, as I attribute it to the PI, is the following: Humans communicate with each other, no matter whether they belong to the same or to (radically) different cultures, on the basis of shared ways of acting (“Handlungsweisen”). Where no such shared ways of acting exist, there they can be developed. I will argue that Wittgenstein makes ontological claims about what human nature is, and, most importantly, that there is a common human nature.
дата:
четвъртък, 31 окт.
място:
блок 4 и блок 1 на кампус „Изток“
за контакти: